Low Bar for Energy Czar
|
Posted By: June Posted on: Oct. 5, 2008 at 6:38 AM |
0.0 / 5
Based on 0 ratings.
|
Pronouncements from McCain's foremost expert on energy:
Comments:
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 09:44:01 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Zanubiyah on Oct. 5, 2008 at 08:51:39 AM]
Zanubiyah
Oct. 5, 2008 at 08:51:39 AM June...this means that you and I are just as qualified (by the Palin standard) to be energy czars too. Today I changed the batteries in the smoke detectors, and plugged somthing in...I am sure today as well. I am sure you are just as... View this Comment You betcha, Zanubiyah! Can I be your running mate? wink wink |
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 10:21:13 AM
|
||
| Sorry to burst your bubble here sweetheart, but you got your s*** wrong, again. "Factcheck: Sarah Palin on Alaskan Energy Production Written by Dave Nalle Published September 18, 2008 On the campaign trail this week Vice Presidential hopeful Sarah Palin claimed that she was well qualified to advise John McCain in the role of 'Energy Czar,' because as Governor of Alaska, she oversaw "nearly 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of oil and gas.” On MSNBC on Thursday, while interviewing McCain ally Senator Sam Brownback, Norah O'Donnell challenged Palin's claims and said that "In fact Alaska does not supply 20% of the US domestic supply of oil and gas. It's just 7.5%. If she doesn't know the facts, then why do we want her to be the Energy Czar for the entire United States?" Senator Brownback wasn't expecting the question and wasn't prepared with a ready comeback for the hard numbers O'Donnell put forward, but as always the facts speak for themselves. According to the Resource Development Council for Alaska, "Alaska's oil and gas industry has produced more than 16 billion barrels of oil and 6 billion cubic feet of natural gas, accounting for an average of 20 percent of the entire nation's domestic production (1980 - 2000)." More recent figures from the Department of Energy show that Alaska is responsible for 18.1% of United States domestic oil production and 13.1% of domestic natural gas production. So Palin's claim is dead on, based on statements from Alaska's main energy industry organization, though their figures are slightly out of date. Even based on the most up-to-date data, her statement on natural gas production may be slightly overstated, but she's pretty close on oil production, as 18.1% can reasonably be described as "nearly 20%." And the combined production percentage of 15.6% is double O'Donnell's figure of 7.5% and much closer to 20% than it is to 7.5%. O'Donnell's comment relies on the same figures and the same Palin quote used by other NBC reporters this week, including Savannah Guthrie on the NBC Nightly News on Wednesday night, and seems to be that news outlet's 'party line' on this topic. The source of this error appears to be the erroneous conclusion that Palin was referring to domestic energy production, which would include coal, nuclear, hydroelectric and other sources, rather than specifically oil and gas which is what she said in the statement O'Donnell quoted. Palin has once previously mistakenly referred to domestic energy production, in her September 11th <a href="[link:;marklevinshow.com] interview</a> with Charlie Gibson, but that is not the quote which NBC has been quoting or using video of. Whether this is just an example of bad research, poor editorial oversight or media bias, it does raise the question of why, if accurate facts are important, anyone would want to watch Norah O'Donnell get them wrong on MSNBC or Savannah Guthrie misstate them on the NBC Nightly News."Want to try again? |
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 10:49:50 AM
|
||
| AA. I think your comment proved June right. Palin was flat out wrong to say that Alaska supplies 20% of domestic energy. As your reference material states: The source of this error appears to be the erroneous conclusion that Palin was referring to domestic energy production, which would include coal, nuclear, hydroelectric and other sources, rather than specifically oil and gas which is what she said in the statement |
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 11:07:17 AM
|
||
| June...yea, you can be the pretty young, energetic one, and I can be the old guy...lol
|
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 09:41:16 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Average American on Oct. 5, 2008 at 10:21:13 AM]
Average American
Oct. 5, 2008 at 10:21:13 AM Sorry to burst your bubble here sweetheart, but you got your s*** wrong, again. "Factcheck: Sarah Palin on Alaskan Energy Production Written by Dave Nalle Published September 18, 2008 On the campaign trail this week Vice Presidential hopeful Sarah... View this Comment BAA, I agree with Indie - after all, Sarah said "nearly 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy."It's easy to see how your comments here tie into your broadside against the press, in general, and also into Sarah's refusal to meet enemies without preconditions - that is, if you include the print media on her enemies list!Precondition #1: No number or statistic cited by Sarah shall be published, quoted or passed along until a white paper explaining what she meant is released.Plus, she says nucular - you call that change? |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!

Report Abuse