When Is a Rose Not a Rose? When Growing One Requires Policy!

CLB wrote "American people agree with the words they hear conservatives mouth, but they don't understand that those words are distoreted to get them to vote what seems like "common sense policy" but is instead, deeply destructive pro-fascist reregulation of assets from workers to owners under the guise of Americanism."

Garsh, us bitter folk clinging to religion and guns are so lucky to have you Progryssve elites spin out some double-speak "proving" everything we know to be true is exactly the opposite. When we argue against confiscatory taxes to be used for government backed social engineering we are supporting the plutocracy. When we object to the power of government being used to extract taxes to support political candidates we disagree with we are asking for less freedom. When we fight against government dictatorship of our health care we are asking for more government control.   How thoughtless of conservatives to reject your vision of nirvanna.

At least Big Brother had the good sense to torture Winston before he told him 2 + 2=5.   Your stuck with "agree with me or your stupid."

Garsh, us bitter folk clinging to religion and guns are so lucky to have you Progryssve elites spin out some double-speak "proving" everything we know to be true is exactly the opposite.

There you go again-- unable to create a reasoned response you resort to what you think is sarcasm.  It is not.  It is a sad but perfect regurgitation of nonsense speak.  You have no idea what you actually wrote means.  You d]have no idea what  progressive is or our value system.  You have no idea what an elite is, except as the word is taped into any phrase including liberal (it really is amazing to listen to conservative speak and how simply that cut and paste think rolls off the tongue).

When we argue against confiscatory taxes

there is no such thing as a confiscatory tax in the United States, unless you read conservative think-tank jargon -- the sources that created it to explain their theory that needs to be in place to convince otherwise logical people  it is:

to be used for government backed social engineering we are supporting the plutocracy.

PLUTOCRACY: A plutocracy is a form of government where the state's power is centralized in an affluent social class. The degree of economic inequality is high while the level of social mobility is low.

When we object to the power of government being used to extract taxes to support political candidates we disagree with we are asking for less freedom.

Point of information-- exact amount of tax dollars "extracted" by the feds to elect candidates please?

But this I suppose is acceptable: WASHINGTON -- Sen. David Vitter, R-La., earmarked $100,000 in a spending bill for a Louisiana Christian group that has challenged the teaching of Darwinian evolution in the public school system and to which he has political ties.

When we fight against government dictatorship of our health care

Excuse me?!  Why are you so threatened by helping people you don't know? 

we are asking for more government control.   How thoughtless of conservatives to reject your vision of nirvanna.

I know conservatives feel suffering is character-building but I am committed to ensuring the only ones who suffer thanks to their policies-- are conservatives.  Nirvanna is obviously for those whoare not masochistic and enjoy being alive.

Your stuck with "agree with me or your stupid."

No actually, you're the one stuck with being stupid.