I received the following in an email from Congressman Wexler and I was thinking. What if the Bush had made this speech when trying to convince the country to invade Iraq? Since this was the real reason for the invasion would Congress have signed that horrific blank check for Bush? Would the American people have been on board for an invasion of a country just to attempt to ensure global stability (whatever that means)?
Also I noticed that the good General did not answer one of the two questions, "for what did the 4024 sons and daughters die for?", because there is really no satisfactory answer.
You may or may not have noticed but the "War President" has not repeated the phrase "noble cause" since he first used it.
TRANSCRIPT
Congressman Wexler:
There was an extraordinary response, with more than five thousand questions submitted, these e-mails and phone calls expressed deeply held frustrations about the war in Iraq, and reflect the concerns of millions across the nation who feel their opinions and concerns were cast aside by the Bush Administration.
I want to thank everyone who responded and submitted a question for today's hearings. While many of the respondents rightfully-highlighted the bravery of our troops, a majority of the e-mails expressed a strong desire to see withdrawal of American soldiers from Iraq, and an end to this five year war, that has cost our nation so dearly.
Most of the question! s boiled down to this: General we often hear President Bush and Senator McCain say we must win in Iraq. What is the definition of winning? What would a military victory look like, that was sufficient enough, to allow us to begin leaving?
Then, in a horrific turn of events, two of my constituents: Hester and Linn Wolfer of Boca Raton Florida, learned that this past Sunday their son had been killed for this war. Major Stuart Wolfer was a thirty six year reservist on his second tour. He was married with three young children ages five, three, and twenty months. His family was relieved that he was in the green zone, for they hoped he would be safe there. He was not.
I spoke to Mr. Wolfer yesterday last night, who asked me to ask you, simply: For What, for what had he lost his son? So allow me to combine if you will, the questions from the people that responded to me and Mr. Wolfer: What has all this been for? And please, respectfully, don't tell us as you told Senator Warner yesterday: to remove a brutal dictator. That's not good enough.
There are many dictators in the world. For what did Stuart Wolfer and the other four thousand and twenty four sons and daughters die for? And how will we define victory, so we can bring this never ending war to a close?
And if I will, when Mr. Burton asks for a definition of what is failure, we get a litany of items. But when Mr. Ackerman asks what is the definition of victory, we get little. Please tell us General, What is winning?
General Petraeus: First of all, Congress, let me tell you that what we are fighting for is national interest.
It is interest that as I stated have to do with Al Qaeda, a sworn enemy of the United States and the free world, has to do with the possible spread of sectarian conflict in Iraq, conflict that had engulfed that country and had it on the brink of Civil War.
It has to do with regional stability, a region that is of critical importance to the global economy, and it has to do with certainly the influence of Iran, another obviously very important element, in that region.
In terms of what it is that we are trying to achieve, I think simply it is a country that is at peace with itself and its neighbors, it is a country that can defend itself, that has a government that is reasonably representative and broadly responsive to its citizens, and a country that is involved in and engaged in, again the global economy.
Ambassador Crocker and I, for what it's worth, have typically seen ourselves as minimalists, we're not after the Holy Grail in Iraq and we're not after Jeffersonian Democracy.
We're after conditions that would allow our soldiers to disengage, and that is in fact what we are doing. As we achieve progress, as we have with the Surge, and that is what is indeed allowing us to withdraw the Surge forces, again well over one quarter of our ground combat power five of 20 brigade combat teams plus two marine battalions and the marine expeditionary unit by the end of July.
Congressman Wexler: Thank you.







del.icio.us
Digg It!


What if we all stood behind the troops and the President like we did on 9/12/2001. What the f*** if?
You think Amadinerjacket would be speaking out loud in the safety of his own country. Not a chance.
What if the polls being released by this country showed a 90% approval of the war. It would have been over by now.
What if instead of publishing the way in which we were tracking terrorist money, the New York Times had kept their mouth shut.
What if they caught the f*** who told the NY Times what was going on and they strung that traitorous bastard up?
What if, instead of wasting time and money bitching and interrogating American Service Men and Women about Abu Graib those so called journalist had kept quiet about it and told only the military so they could have dealt with the few bad apples and flushed thing out quietly so that the enemy didn't have a huge propaganda piece to share with their side?
What if Wexler was explaining how as a Senator he stood by as we spent more money that ever in this country? What if he stood up and took responsibility for the mis-management of funds that has helped to cause this problem?
What if pansy-assed liberals stood up and found something to be proud of their country about and concentrated on that for five minutes a day instead of throwing this country under a bus every time they thought it would reflect poorly on the Bush Administration?
What if we didn't look to the government to fix every f***ing thing that isn't perfect in this country and started fixing it ourselves?
What if we took financial responsibility for the bad loan some took out and took the hit today and learned a lesson?
What if we really thought about the future and figured out a way to ween people off of Social Security so our kids wouldn't have to spend nearly 80% on their taxes to feed people who for the next 30 years will continue to do nothing but bitch?
You're right Johnny Green or Johnny Pinko Green. What the f*** if?
Report Abuse