The article name might ring a distant bell to some of you not interested the pop culture of the 1960’s, the rest of you will understand the title immediately.
Tribbles, those little furry bastards that kept popping up on the Enterprise every time you turned around are what the current scandal driven American Politic has made of the Bimbo Alert. It doesn’t matter if there isn’t a shred of evidence as in the current fever around Senator and presidential candidate J. Sydney McCain, or if there is tons of evidence, stained dresses and multiple entry and exit documents showing the goings and comings of presidential visits as with someone we all remember, the countries craving for scandal seems to be insatiable. These are the Tribbles of which I speak.
The Trouble with Tribbles is that it should be none of our business. But it is our business. And here’s why…
If a sitting President of the United States of America feels ashamed enough to lie about an affair, whether physically consummated or not, then it could well become a tool of someone else to control or at the very least influence a world leaders decision making. People said that Clinton lied to cover it up from his wife. That’s a perfect example of it not just being a personal matter. These Tribbles are a real problem. I don’t expect every person to be perfect because that is impossible, but am I the only man left who has never cheated on his wife or been smart enough to never place myself in a position to be accused of maybe possibly cheating on my wife?
If a person would lie to his wife about cheating (which I am sure most every man would) then it is a blackmail opportunity for someone out there to exploit. If a person would lie about sex, gambling, having a drink, doing coke, whatever… it creates a major opening for all kinds of manipulation at the very least and world altering control at the very worst.
I question this on both sides of our current candidate roster. McCain is dealing with a possible scandal that will probably turn out to be bull s*** from what I have seen so far. Think about it, nobody is actually accusing him of doing anything wrong, they say it just looked wrong. B. Hussein Obama has the question of his drug past, which he at least has made some mention of its validity as in he might have sold dope in his youth, so that really can’t be used as much of a weapon. And then we have Hillary and Lord only knows how much crap she has been knee deep in, whether her own or her over sexed husbands over the years. Huckabee I am sure is not a pure as he portrays himself to be, but I doubt it would be a scandal of this kind, but we will never know because he isn’t a real contender so nobody is going to waste the time to torpedo him because it would be a wasted shot.
Those of you who think that, “It was sex between two consenting adults and none of our business” are just wrong. It is “just sex” when it is between ordinary people, but politicians carry a sacred oath to defend the constitution and they have just a hair more responsibility than you and I have on any given day. You and I might lose a wife, our kids and maybe a home which can be bad enough, but it affects us and our immediate families. A president, congressman, senator, Chief of staff etc can influence the lives of millions here and abroad if they are made puppets to their own inequities.
I believe that if there is anything like this in a candidate’s past it should be disclosed and it should count. If they have already done it once, they might again, and this time they might get caught, not by their wife, but by a foreign power, terrorist group or even a lobbyist who might pressure them to do their bidding in stead of ours. This has to be factored in when considering who you are going to give the job of the most power man in world to.
As with most things in America these days, this probably smacks of puritan morality and some of you will undoubtedly find what I am saying as old fashion and hypocritical. Old fashion, perhaps; hypocritical not a chance. But it also correct. Blackmail unlike many things doesn’t go out of style. It has been around since the start of time and it will be with us until the end of time.
And as I said above it doesn’t have to be about sex. Drug use, abuse, addiction, sexual depravity, any of these things, when in the hands of those with power to make our lives easier of harder, tax us more or less, launch a war or find peace, hell to place a freeway through a town or around it, these things matter to all of us. We need to stop expecting our leaders to be just like us, the guy we would have a beer with, and start expecting great things from great leaders. Someone once said that American gets the leadership they ask for. Well I think it is high time we ask for the best to run, the best to win and for the best to lead.
But what would I know; I’m just an Average American.
The Trouble with Tribbles
|
Posted By: Average American Posted on: Feb. 21, 2008 at 4:04 PM |
3.0 / 5
Based on 2 ratings.
|
Comments:
|
Feb. 21, 2008 at 10:54:33 PM
|
||
| Blackmail? Are ewe serious? The 60s also brought us a sexual revolution that embraced sex as a natural, healthy, liberating and quite pleasurable human activity. Forty years later, the cultural aftermath is some who get off on casual, even extramarital, sex and others who get off thinking, talking and writing about it. The latter usually condemn the former. Even that conservative ol' hubby Henry Hyde, who was named the 1994 Catholic American of the Year, had a "youthful indiscretion" named Cheri Snodgrass, didn't he? And whatta about that serial free-lover Newt Gingrich? Damn, politics is just full doers! BTW: are articles like this listed in the Army Field Manual? |
||
|
Feb. 22, 2008 at 06:02:23 AM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
[This is a reply to comment by June on Feb. 21, 2008 at 10:54:33 PM]
June
Feb. 21, 2008 at 10:54:33 PM Blackmail? Are ewe serious? The 60s also brought us a sexual revolution that embraced sex as a natural, healthy, liberating and quite pleasurable human years later, the cultural aftermath is some who get off on casual,... View this Comment June, You listed not one reason why this article was wrong. Thank you for your support. |
||
|
Feb. 22, 2008 at 07:35:21 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by June on Feb. 21, 2008 at 10:54:33 PM]
June
Feb. 21, 2008 at 10:54:33 PM Blackmail? Are ewe serious? The 60s also brought us a sexual revolution that embraced sex as a natural, healthy, liberating and quite pleasurable human years later, the cultural aftermath is some who get off on casual,... View this Comment June.... Think about it........Jeffy Guckert..... |
||
|
Feb. 22, 2008 at 08:08:19 AM
|
||
| AA, You pose an interesting concept. Maybe I have a view that we need a leader for this Country that can simply do the job! I really do not care that much about what has happened in the past in their private life. It is what they are going to do to get us out of the mess that we are in now. We need someone who is going to address the economy, Irag, and future sources of energy. The problem, like I have stated in the past, is that we never really get a candidate that is going to be "perfect" for the job! Most politicians that I have met are very ego driven and have a mindset to conquer. They are very competitive and with being that, they will always reach out to the edges to gain a competitive edge. They simply love the power. With that love comes conquering women (or young pages) and other "activities". The intoxication of power, money, and influence that our government has created for elected officials is overwhelming! We will never really get a person in office that will do "the job"! Those people are not motivated with what the system is set up to do. These people are not wanting the fan fair that comes along with those offices. Finally, they really do not want the media scrutiny that comes with the job. The people that I have met that have run very successful companies have a totally different mind set and a love of the job/project that they are doing. I don't really see that with our current batch of representatives. It is all about the power for them. Like I said, I really do not care that much about the past of a person. I want to judge them on what they are going to do to make this Country great for all of us. |
||
|
Feb. 22, 2008 at 08:11:08 AM
|
||
| You’re correct. Your off-handed dismissal of the “it’s none of your business” and the Puritanical moralistic posturing you use to arrive at your conclusion that blackmail is a threat to national security is right outta the repressive 50s, if not From Russia With Love! But, I particularly liked your contention that an oath “to uphold the Constitution” means one should never have exercised the free will to have a sexual affair - that’s rich! And thanks for using Obama’s middle name. Should we expect that to become a mainstay in your future penetratingly incisive analyses? |
||
|
Feb. 22, 2008 at 08:26:58 AM
|
||
| C'mon Adam - the guy who uses decisive military action would naturally be attracted to a hot military stud! And Free Thinker - Do the job? Now there's a novel concept! Don't cha ya think an adjunct to the oath of office pledging marital fidelity or, better yet, sexual abstinence would would improve the quality of performance and be a boost to national security? |
||
|
Feb. 22, 2008 at 10:33:28 AM
|
||
| Using sexual trysts as blackmail material only works, if the persons involved treat what they've done as wrong. The late, great Sen Strom Thurmond SC-R, got caught by a newspaper sting, in a hotel with a young lady, and he admonished them with "you set a honey trap, you gonna catch me every time!" Strom gave them nowhere to go. Clinton's dumbass let himself get into the docket, and then he was splitting hairs. The lawyers agreed to a definition of sex, and then the lawyers were allowed to ask about sex - not individual acts. The definition was "I" did it to the other person. And by that defintion, when he was asked about Lewinsky, he could honestly, and w/o commiting perjury answer no. Why? Because oral sex involves the other person doing something to you.
|
||
|
Feb. 22, 2008 at 11:35:43 AM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| June, You miss the point. It's not just sex, its any kind of activity that the person would feel shame about. Think of it this way, I tell my kids that when they are invited to do something that they think they might get in trouble for they should ask themselves one question, Would dad get pissed? If the answer is yes, cover your ass and call me. If the answer is no, go ahead. If a politician asked them selves one question only it should be, Would I lie about this if I was asked? If the answer is yes, they shouldn't do it. And yes this applies to all parties, all offices and all people running for office at any level. As for Obama's middle name, I used McCain's too. Does this cause a problem? Free Thinker, I agree we need someone who can do the job, but which job? I want a person who will not pass the pain onto any group to save another group from it, that accomplishes nothing. I want a person to use our military as intended and one who will uphold every value Americans hold dear. But you don't get the best unless you expect the best. Sorry pal, but everyone running right now sucks. No matter which party. Phaedrus, You are dead on. Strom didn't care if it got out so there was no fun in the playing of gotcha with him. Clinton did. Those with no moral compass can move through our society with little issue of getting caught. Perhaps that's all we need, someone who doesn't give a s***. |
||
|
Feb. 22, 2008 at 12:05:49 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Average American on Feb. 22, 2008 at 11:35:43 AM]
Average American
Feb. 22, 2008 at 11:35:43 AM June, You miss the point. It's not just sex, its any kind of activity that the person would feel shame about. Think of it this way, I tell my kids that when they are invited to do something that they think they might get in trouble for they should... View this Comment No, we need to realize that the sort of ego it takes to reach the top of a major nation, or corporation is the sort that sees objects they want, and they go get them. Look at most of our US Presidents, nearly all of them had mistresses at one point in their lives. Most CEO's wind up in divorce court at some point. Many top lawyers, tele-mega-preachers, actors and athletes going down the same road. America needs to grow up, sexually, and realize that most men(90), after a certain point, stop finding their wives attractive. They then will, if they can, chase other women. Sorry, it's biological. |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


Report Abuse