Michigan Primary

And I hope somehow YOU could explain it all to us with FACTS the need for selling cocaine to fund an illegal war and supply our ENEMIES with ARMS..... like your dear Raygun did.....

And then tell us how it benefited the American citizen and not some coporate special interest...

DARE you...... loser.......

We all know you would, if you only could.....

1. Nothing changes, the rules are upheld, and their delegates aren't seated.
2. Clinton wins, rules get changed, and delegates are seated.
3. They do a Do Over, a Mulligan, and the party pays for another primary. There is precedence for such a move, DE in 96.
4. Obama continues racking up wins, and after TX and OH go in his column, Hillary drops out, and they seat the MI and FL delegates.
5. Hillary comes back, wins a few states, Obama drops out, and Hillary seats the delegates.

My question has NOT been answered.

A duck is not an answer.

You are still supporting subverting the Constitution with a second secret government that is beyond the scruntiny and accoutability of the duly elected Representatives of these United States.

We could funnel millions into so called Black Operations out of the light of those pesky politicians who think they know what’s best for America all the time.

Funnel millions in drug and drug tainted money into trading arms for our enemies in violation of the law, is just what Raygun's Administration did.

http://www.voiceofarizona.com/Off_Budget_Black_Operations-5031-2-12647.htm?mult=1#comments

What do you have against holding people (make that NeoCONs and CONservERtives) responsible for the law and their actions....

Are you forgetting that their is this thing call the Constitution that provides checks and balances for the President.

That includes Congress as part of that check.

The President is NOT a dictator, no matter how much you would like that.

The Boland Amendment was the name given to three U.S. legislative amendments between 1982 and 1984, all aimed at limiting US government assistance to the rebel Contras in Nicaragua. The first Boland Amendment was to the House Appropriations Bill of 1982, which was attached as a rider to the Defense Appropriations Act of 1983, named for the Massachusetts Democrat, Representative Edward Patrick Boland, who authored it. The House of Representatives passed the Defense Appropriations Act 411-0 on December 8, 1982^[1] and it was signed by President Ronald Reagan on December 21, 1982.^[2] The amendment outlawed US assistance to the Contras for the purpose of overthrowing the Nicaraguan government, while allowing assistance for other purposes.^[3]

Robert McFarlane resigned in December 1985.^[15] He was replaced by Admiral John Poindexter. On the day of McFarlane's resignation, Oliver North, a military aide to the United States National Security Council (NSC), proposed a new plan for selling arms to Iran. This time, there were two new ideas. Instead of selling arms through Israel, the sale was to be direct. Second, the proceeds from the sale would go to the Contras at a markup. Oliver North wanted a $15 million markup, while contracted Iranian arms broker Manucher Ghorbanifar added a 41% markup of his own.^[16] Other members of the NSC were in favor of North's plan. John Poindexter authorized the plan, and it went into effect.^[17]

At first, the Iranians refused to buy the arms at the inflated price because of the excessive markup imposed by North and Ghorbanifar. In February 1986, 1000 TOW missiles were shipped to Iran.^[17] From May to November 1986, there were additional shipments of miscellaneous weapons and parts.^[17]

^{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boland_Amendment}

"He essentially dumped on Gore by nit supporting his run."

I'm thinking it was the other way around.  I think Gore wanted to get as far away from the Clinton name as he could, which was s bad move on his part.  Had Clinton campaigned for Gore, Gore more than likely would have won the election.

Florida and Michigan are definitely touchy subjects - they're going to have to come up with some sort of plan where the voters of these states are not dissenfranchised, otherwise that is going to be a major problem.  Florida and Michigan are sort of a no-win situation for everyone involved.

Maybe they could take the 366 delegates (or how ever many there are) these two states have, and add them to states that haven't voted yet, or maybe they could take the 366 total and either add them to the existing superdelegates that haven't voted, or name some new superdelegates.

They have to stand firm on the delegates not counting for either the state of  Florida and/or Michigan, otherwise they're have everyone jumping in to be first next time around, but they need to get the counts in for the people of these two states.

P.