How many dead "ragheads" is ENOUGH.


Now that Bu$h and Cheney have admitted that Oilraq is another Vietnam, though without the humidity.(though I still don't see

that Bu$h or Cheney  has a plan to get out of Oilraq like they did Vietnam)

How much murder and mayhem is enough?

The ONLY reason we didnt win in Vietnam is that we just didnt kill enough Vietnamese.
The only mistake we made, was leaving before we killed enough.
Killed enough to make them see that we were just 'liberating' them and setting them free.

You know is we had just 'nuked' the whole f***ing place, they would have been free to participate in our form of democracy.

This is the same logic that Bu$hCo is trying to sell for Oilraq, we just need to stay longer and kill more.
Never mind that the senseless murder of innocents is leading to a greater insurgency and a tremendous growth in 'al-Qaeda'.

Bu$h's answer is - we just need to kill more....over THERE so we don't have to fight them over HERE.

This murderous mentality is sick and depraved, but seems to be quite acceptable to Reichties and NeoCONS, even those, like Bu$h

professing to be 'born again' under 'christianity'.

 

Even though we lost in Vietnam, they did not attack us over here.
There were no communist invasions of California, Iowa, or New York.


The whole flaw of Bu$h's argument falls flat on its face when you look at America's Reichstag incident, September 11.

Bu$h REFUSED and REFUSES to actually track down and capture the man responsible - OSAMA bin Laden, he diverted monies and

resources away from bin Ladens search to blitzkreig Oilraq and murder more innocents.

Osama is STILL over THERE, waiting to attack us over HERE.

2,175 days and Osama is still free......

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?.f56v6vm9&show_article=1

 

So tell me, how many is enough?
HOw many have to die to cover up either Bu$hCo's involvment with bin Laden or his ineptness at capturing him?