Excepts from George W. Bush's speech to the nation Wednesday evening:
the armed forces of the United States are engaged in a struggle that will determine the direction of the global war on terror and our safety here at home
The situation in Iraq is unacceptable to the American people, and it is unacceptable to me
It is clear that we need to change our strategy in Iraq
Failure in Iraq would be a disaster for the United States
The consequences of failure are clear: Radical Islamic extremists would grow in strength and gain new recruits. They would be in a better position to topple moderate governments, create chaos in the region and use oil revenues to fund their ambitions. Iran would be emboldened in its pursuit of nuclear weapons. Our enemies would have a safe haven from which to plan and launch attacks on the American people.
For the safety of our people, America must succeed in Iraq.
The most urgent priority for success in Iraq is security
Our past efforts to secure Baghdad failed
There were not enough Iraqi and American troops to secure neighborhoods that had been cleared of terrorists and insurgents
This is a strong commitment. But for it to succeed, our commanders say the Iraqis will need our help
This will require increasing American force levels
This time, we will have the force levels we need to hold the areas that have been cleared
Now is the time to act
As we make these changes, we will continue to pursue Al Qaida
an American defeat in Iraq would create a new sanctuary for extremists
The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East is more than a military conflict. It is the decisive ideological struggle of our time . On one side are those who believe in freedom and moderation. On the other side are extremists who kill the innocent, and have declared their intention to destroy our way of life
victory in Iraq will bring something new in the Arab world: a functioning democracy that polices its territory, upholds the rule of law, respects fundamental human liberties, and answers to its people
America is engaged in a new struggle that will set the course for a new century
__________________________________________________________________
Wow! It really sounds like what we do in Iraq at the present moment will not only critically impact the security of the United States, but will define the future of freedom and democracy across the globe. How does Bush put it: It is the decisive ideological struggle of our time.
You know, with the stakes so high, similar to the fight against global totalitarianism during World War II, I just have to ask: Why isn't this President insisting upon a draft?
If he truly believes his rhetoric, why run the risk of a devastating defeat in that country as a consequence of an undermanned, under-supplied, and overstretched military? Why take the chance of orchestrating yet another ill-conceived and poorly executed plan for victory to toss upon the teetering tower of past ignominious failures the President has engineered? Does it make any sense to take such a gamble with our collective future, unless you happen to have a track history of reckless gambling? I mean really, just 21,500 more troops to stand between us and utter ruin, when we have previously "surged" with many more men than that to no avail. Insane, isn't it?
Well I have an alternate explanation for the incongruence between our Moron-In-Chief's words and his actions. And you don't have to look very far for the answers:
Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges. This begins with addressing Iran and Syria.
Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops. We will disrupt the attacks on our forces.
And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq.
I recently ordered the deployment of an additional carrier strike group to the region.
We will expand intelligence-sharing and deploy Patriot air defense systems to reassure our friends and allies.
And we will work with others to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons and dominating the region.
Oh boy, we're going to war again!!! That's what I told my wife as soon as Bush uttered these words the other night. She did not agree, and said that I was reaching. Well, wouldn't you know it, the next day we awoke to find that U.S. troops stormed an Iranian embassy in Irbil, Iraq (embassy soil is sovereign territory by international treaty), in effect invading Iran and committing an act of war in order to provoke the Iranians into a war. This is just the opening salvo: Bush will pick a fight with Iran just as surely as the juvenile delinquent Shrub had picked many a fight with the weaker kids in the school playground. But this time the bully has nukes.
It's almost too irresistible for Bush to resist - like a line of coke to a former addict - and he will do anything to get his fix of war-related profits, glory, and power. The undesirable side-effects of his habit - poverty, death, pain, and carnage - will never be suffered by him or his family. He's the Decider you see, and others will have to make the sacrifices when the President decides.
Here We Go . . . Again!!!
|
Posted By: www.MoronInCharge.com Posted on: Jan. 12, 2007 at 12:11 PM |
3.8 / 5
Based on 8 ratings.
|
Anonymous commenting has been disabled, you must login to comment on articles.
Signup for an accountComments:
|
Jan. 12, 2007 at 02:40:15 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Ignore the several fat-fingered spelling errors above.
|
||
|
Jan. 12, 2007 at 02:57:14 PM
|
||
| I am so sick of these people! I hope that when it is all over the entire lot of them crawl back into the slime from where they came! I can't stand to look at them, hear them, or know that they exsist! I can't even read the filth that the nazis on this site write anymore! I can't stand them!
|
||
|
|
Jan. 12, 2007 at 03:53:30 PM
|
|
| Did yeah catch the news that the boy king sent ANOTHER carrier group, the Eisenhower Strike Group over to the Persian Gulf. That pesky Terrorist Airforce and Navy are the cause of all Iraq's problems. Get ready, Iran's comming next! |
||
|
Jan. 12, 2007 at 04:11:30 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| I'm sure Eisenhower is puking up worms in his coffin knowing that an aircraft carrier with his name is steaming into the Persian Gulf to escalate one war of convenience and instigate/expedite yet another in the name of obscene profits for the military-industrial complex. And now we have a navy admiral to head Cent-com, naturally to oversee two ground wars in the huge land mass of central Asia. |
||
|
Jan. 12, 2007 at 07:13:24 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Either the Bush administration is right-we as a country are as stupid as they think we are or the majority of the American people are asleep at the switch again. Remember before the Iraq war? Bush and team insisted that war not was inevitable and that it was a last resort and that there were no war plans on the President's desk? Remember the reports of Bush's idea to paint a plane in such a way that Iraq would shoot at it, thus giving Bush a reason to invade? How about the escalation of the No-Fly Zone attacks by the US and British military months before the invasion? Sound familiar? The bombing in Iran starts soon. |
||
|
Cancelled Account
Jan. 12, 2007 at 07:48:29 PM
|
| This user has cancelled their account with Voice of North America. | |
|
Jan. 12, 2007 at 09:14:41 PM
|
||
| Any odds on when the war on Iranians starts? I'll take March 3rd.
|
||
|
Jan. 12, 2007 at 10:03:40 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Tom, it does not surprise me, and you obviously have not read anything I've had written during the last three years. Unlike you, my cynicism for this Administration does not implicitly extend to all politicians, and I'd like to give the Democrats a chance to put their words into action before condemning them. Democrats and Republicans may both live on Capitol Hill, but guilt by association is not enough to convict. The fight isn't over to save our Constitution from the inside, even if you read the writing on the wall as telling you to give up. So McCain touched your privates the wrong way, and now you're a disenchanted ex-Republican, and you think all Democrats are Republican lite, and all the bums can be run out of town for all you care. That's fine, that's your nihilistic opinion, and we may have your revolution someday if we cannot remove this MoronInCharge from office constitutionally. But you are not the only one with eyes to see, no matter how much you fashion yourself as the voice in the wildedrness. Other than telling us to wake up and wise up, do you have any constructive advice to offer? Hunter and Shelton told us we need to go back to the Gold Standard and abolsih the Federal Reserve, but it ain't gonna happen - not any time soon at least. AA says we just need to allow our soldiers to fight this war like a war, by whatever means necessary, whatever the hell that means (and I don't want to know). You're telling us that neither Republicans nor Democrats are fit to lead, but what do you offer in their place? Does your activism include any solutions, or just insults? |
||
|
Jan. 12, 2007 at 10:42:30 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| If you were wandering what the odds are on the US attacking Iran here you go. 1). Bush orders the attack before January 22nd 200/1 (you lay $1 to win $200) 2). Between January 23 and February 13 100/1 3). February 14th 1000/1 4). February 15th to March 1st 50/1 5). March 1st and June 1st 5/4 6). Sometime this year (no action)
Let me know if you can find a place to bet the sometime this year. There aren’t very many sure things in life but I think I may have found one. Sad isn’t it, and there is nothing any of us can do to stop this mad man.
The odds above I made up but I believe they are close
|
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


Report Abuse