It is not very often that I find myself praising George W. Bush. In fact, I cannot recall the last time. However I must give credit where credit is due, and Bush’s decision to designate a 140,000 square-mile area of ocean real estate, including a large portion of the Northwest Hawaiian Island chain, a protected marine reserve should be unequivocally lauded.
The region, encompassing a 1200 mile stretch of the Sandwich Islands extending northwest from Kauai to include the Midway and Kure atolls, is remote and unpopulated, but harbors a vast variety of marine life and endangered species. The region was already slated to be named a national marine sanctuary, but this form of protection could take more than a year to enact and may be challenged in court. Bush’s decision to exercise his powers under the National Antiquities Act to immediately protect this marine habitat effectively sidesteps the possibility of protracted public debate, legal battles, and weakened regulations. Bush’s decision also completes the work begun by Bill Clinton in the late nineties, protecting specific marine resources in the area and ordering federal agencies to prepare for the upcoming marine sanctuary designation.
It may be argued that the federal protection of this marine habitat was inevitable and faced little resistance; and that President Bush, seeking to gain political points for an uncharacteristically environmentalist position, decided to finish rather than block the initiative. As the evidence for global warming mounts and is embraced by more and more politicians in Congress – and within the Bush Administration – this move, at least in part, signifies recognition of the potentially large role that the environment may play during the upcoming election. It certainly will help the reelection prospects of Hawaii’s first ever Republican governor, Linda Lingle, a strong supporter of the Northwest Hawaiian Island sanctuary.
Whether the motive for Bush’s environmental preemption is political expediency or not, it is difficult to find fault with the final action. One can hope that similar preemption applied to broader environmental protections and a “Manhattan Project” for clean economic renewable energy production, and not warfare, is forthcoming. One can only hope.
George Bush the Environmentalist: Are We Witnessing a Sea Change in Policy?
|
Posted By: www.MoronInCharge.com Posted on: Jun. 15, 2006 at 1:11 PM |
2.9 / 5
Based on 5 ratings.
|
Anonymous commenting has been disabled, you must login to comment on articles.
Signup for an accountComments:
|
Jun. 15, 2006 at 07:29:19 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| I wasn't aware this issue was so polarized and controversial. I don't think I'll ever get any closer to kissing the Presisdent's @$$ than this, unless he becomes a reborn again liberal. Maybe I'll write my next article about china . . . the dishware, that is.
|
||
|
Jun. 15, 2006 at 07:47:13 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Well, whoever it was that bottomed out the rating, I hope he/she has enough guts to write why they did it. I would like to know their viewpoint. And please don't write about china. You have more to contribute. |
||
|
Jun. 15, 2006 at 09:36:13 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Refreshing article, MoronInCharge. I was not aware of the action taken by Dubya. I applaud it, with reservations. When does the other shoe drop? indie616, I noticed the torpedoing also. Gee, I wonder who would sink such a non-divisive article on an act by our great “uniter, not a divider”?? Well, let's pump that 124.17 rating up to exactly 200.95. That will get it going in the right direction and we can build on that. China is a pressing and ongoing issue. Please do write about it, MoronInCharge. I've written articles on the China Threat 'til I'm worn out. But I can see that it is potentially not all threat and rivalry between America and China. The Chinese see that our two economies are inexorably intertwined and missteps on either side can hurt both sides. The potential for both nations is great if cooler heads prevail and the Federal Corporatists of America can be kept from giving the store away. My concern is that the Chinese leadership is much shrewder than our hucksters. I see our "leadership" being outclassed by the Chinese world class long view and patience. It wasn’t always so, but this latest bunch of yahoos inside the beltway is a bad batch. It needs to be thrown out, and replaced with real grownup leadership again! |
||
|
Jun. 15, 2006 at 09:42:01 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| You are correct about being "outclassed" by the Chinese, AZ Moderate. Just ask my Chinese Malaysian wife.
|
||
|
Jun. 15, 2006 at 10:18:39 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| MIC is right. He is outclassed by his wife!
|
||
|
Jun. 15, 2006 at 10:19:45 PM
|
||
| Methinks you work too hard to find a justification beyond local political expediency. With his track record, do you really believe Bush could score positive points with even the most casually involved environmentalists? This is a clearcut case of "Yeah, but..." with an emphasis on clearcut! |
||
|
Jun. 15, 2006 at 10:20:26 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Crack me up, indie!!
|
||
|
Jun. 15, 2006 at 10:49:32 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| I do not need to peer into Bush's soul to find his altruism and noble justifications - they are not there to be found. But even rats can be trained. I could care less what his motivations are, so long as he does the right things. This man lives for conquest and the glow of victory. Coming out on top puts the strut in his peacock swagger. When he, by chance, stumbles into correctness, let us point out the beauty of his plummage. Maybe he'll do it more often. Alright, that's BS. Of course he won't. |
||
|
Jun. 16, 2006 at 10:08:20 AM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| This is a good article Mike, but I think he is doing it for the right resons. You guys are so quick to judge him for his perceived inequities that you even fight when he does something you want. It is this obvious divide within your party that gives us all hope. |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


Someone doesn't like nature I guess. Even when the Dear Leader gets it.
I liked this article. There is much going on besides corruption, scandal and the war. Sometimes you have to see the forest and the trees.
Good for GWB!
Report Abuse