George Bush is a Hero!
|
Posted By: AZ Moderate Posted on: Jan. 21, 2008 at 10:39 PM |
0.0 / 5
Based on 0 ratings.
|
One of the most famous pilots in the Pacific theatre of the Second World War was Lt. (JG) George Bush.
After gradutation from Philliips Academy in Andover, MA, in June of 1942, he joined the U. S. navy upon turning 18.
Following ten months of aviator training, he was commissioned as an Ensign in the U.S. Naval reserves just before his 19th birthday. This made him the youngest Navy Aviator at that time.
In late 1943 he completed further training on the Grumman Avenger torpedo plane and was assigned to Torpedo Squadron 51 (VT-51), part of Air Group 51, embarked on the light aircraft carrier USS San Jacinto CVL-30.
Two years after the Battle of Midway, in June of 1944, his squadron took part in the Marianas Operation - one of the largest battles of WW II. During this battle, Bush's Avenger was forced to ditch in the sea. Bush and his crew were picked up by the destoyer USS Clarence K. Bronson.
Bush quickly returned to operational flying duty and sunk a cargo ship off of the island of Palau in July of 1944.
George H. W. Bush was promoted to Lieutenant JG (Junior Grade) in August, and was soon flying operations against the Japanese in the Bonin Islands as the Allied Forces in the Pacific tightened the noose around the Japanese homeland.
During this campaign, in operations against Japanese installations on the island of Chichi Jima that were supporting the Japanese forces trying to hold Iwo Jima next door, Bush's Avenger was hit by Anti-aircraft fire. His Avenger's engine caught fire, but he pressed home his attack releasing his bombs on target. He then coaxed his stricken aircraft away from the target area and back out to sea to give himself and his crew a chance to bail out and be picked up by an American submarine or destroyer.
Bush managed to bail out of the stricken Avenger, but tragically his Gunner and his Radioman were both killed trying to escape. He still lives with the fact that, despite his efforts, his crew was lost.
Bush floated in his raft for hours while US Fighters circled overhead to keep the Japanese at bay. He was rescued by the Submarine USS Finback, where he subsequently spent a month helping rescue other downed aircrew.
For pressing home the attack in his badly damaged aircraft, George H. W. Bush was awarded the Distingueshed Flying Cross. Here was and is a true American hero!
I salute you 41, President George H. W. Bush. We Americans of the following generation owe you and your generations more than we can know.
I do however have one question, sir: what the @^&**@#@ went wrong with your son, George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States?!? That fruit certainly fell very far from your tree of heroic action in selfless sevice to America.
Comments:
|
Jan. 22, 2008 at 07:56:19 PM
|
||
| Lower the price......
|
||
|
Jan. 22, 2008 at 08:18:36 PM
|
||
| John McCain was a hero (of sorts) too. It doesn't mean I'd vote for either one of them.
|
||
|
Jan. 22, 2008 at 08:45:14 PM
|
||
| This brings up a topic that has always puzzled me. Are you more or less a hero if you get your ass shot of the sky than the wingman who didn't? If the Humvee in front of you got blown up by a IED and you are severely wounded, does that make you more of a hero than the lucky bastard in the following humvee who didn't? Are the American men who are buried in the cemeteries of France more heroic than the men that fought the same battles but managed to come home? Just wondering............. But, I get the point of your article Mody. |
||
|
Jan. 22, 2008 at 09:48:28 PM
|
||
| Thanks for the comments folks. If I were to distill my thinking on this article, it would yield a thick brew of amazement with the contrasts between …
… No. After gazing at my naval for a period of time, I am at a lose. There are several dimensions and I am finding it hard to organize them for analysis. Doesn’t mean they are not real, but …
… it seems to boil down to the difference between what we are made of. Both Georges were born with a silver spoon in their mouth. Both lived in a time of war. Both have risen to the highest office in the land.
But it seems to me that, whether or not you like Sr., or would vote for him, he would have brought his sense of duty forward with him into the Vietnam era had he been of that generation. Unlike his son currently occupying the Oval Office who shirked his duty by preferential treatment in the Air National Guard champagne squadron in Texas and let others shield him from harm, and so on.
And as angry as I was with Bush Sr. by the end of his presidency, he had a sense of America first, party second that allowed him to govern for the good of our nation as he saw it. I know, I know – oil and such. But still he was of the traditional school of behavior that has served us so well for over two centuries. He would not sell America out.
His kid in the White House is another matter. This is a new animal on the scene. He has no sense of his father's honor and dedication to our nation. The contrast is stunning, and could not have been imagined during the presidency of George Sr. What Dubya has done to us and the world is so much different than what 41 did that it beggars understanding when you remember that it is son and father.
It is frightening when you go back and look at Rome and the increasingly degenerate (with some exceptions) Caesars and such after the ascendancy of Rome as it became corpulent with wealth and corrupt with power, and before its decline, which had alaready begun, became apparent for the world to see. Is Dubya our first degenerate progeny of the autocracy to inhabit the White House?
I can’t help but suspect that 41 is sorely disappointed with 43, and maybe even ashamed of his deplorable legacy.
|
||
|
Jan. 22, 2008 at 10:34:07 PM
|
||
| Too bad Al Gore invented the internets so late in daddy's life. The whole world suffered..... |
||
|
Jan. 27, 2008 at 12:58:50 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by indie616 on Jan. 22, 2008 at 08:45:14 PM]
indie616
Jan. 22, 2008 at 08:45:14 PM This brings up a topic that has always puzzled me. Are you more or less a hero if you get your ass shot of the sky than the wingman who didn't? If the Humvee in front of you got blown up by a IED and you are severely wounded, does that make you more... View this Comment Thought provoking indie616. Your questions expand on a question I've had for some time. We call everyone that has gone to Iraq or Iran in a military uniform a hero. That seems to be a fundamental shift in the definition of a hero. During the Second World War, Korea, Viet Nam and even operation Desert Storm, a hero was an individual that was singled out for performance above and beyond the call of duty. There were few designated heroes. Now everyone is a hero. I have wondered why the bar has been lowered so very far that it in fact cheapens the term 'hero'. I think the reason is that we have a guilty feeling about business as usual here at home while we send these good fellow Americans into the path of danger. We take ourselves off the hook, at least subconsciously, in our own view by bestowing the honorific of 'hero' on all of these folks - an honorific that was reserved for the few in previous history. By calling all of these people that are sacrificing and that we sacrifice heroes while we shop 'til we drop and go on about our daily lives as if there is no conflict where people are suffering and dying, we are submerging our own guilt feelings. It's the equivalent of sticking a "Proud to be an American" sticker on our bumper as our contribution to the carnage.
|
||
|
Jan. 27, 2008 at 07:03:20 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by indie616 on Jan. 22, 2008 at 08:45:14 PM]
indie616
Jan. 22, 2008 at 08:45:14 PM This brings up a topic that has always puzzled me. Are you more or less a hero if you get your ass shot of the sky than the wingman who didn't? If the Humvee in front of you got blown up by a IED and you are severely wounded, does that make you more... View this Comment Furthermore indie616, I suspect most of us have a hero in us, and a coward in us. We cannot know which of those will emerge until we find ourselves in a situation that calls to them. That is except for George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, who are both genetic cowards. |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


Report Abuse