Darkness on the Edge of Town
|
Posted By: www.MoronInCharge.com Posted on: May. 29, 2007 at 11:11 PM |
3.7 / 5
Based on 8 ratings.
|
This directive, supposedly meant to ensure the continuity of government in case of catastrophic emergency, virtually anoints the President with the powers of an emperor in the event of “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government function.”
Now call me conspiratorial, but I find this directive unsettling. What exactly is an “extraordinary” amount of casualty, damage, or disruption? Is it a repeat 9-11? Is it an anthrax attack? Is it another Katrina? Is it a stock market crash? Is it a major blackout, an internet virus, or a solar flare? What about a massive anti-war protest in Washington D.C.? The directive does nothing to lessen my cynical apprehensions when it attempts to specify catastrophe as “localized acts of nature, accidents, and technological or attack-related emergencies.”
Also troubling is the pre-existence of a perfectly fine emergency plan for national continuity called the U.S. Constitution. It held the nation together as the White House burned in the War of 1812, while 11 States attempted to succeed from the Union during the Civil War, through the rise of global fascism in WWII, and under the existential nuclear threat to mankind during the decades of the Cold War. Now, suddenly, the Constitution isn’t good enough for the Boy King?
The directive pays lip service to preserving “the continued function of our form of government under the Constitution, including the functioning of the three separate branches of government,” yet the summary statement from the same document is: “The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.”
NSPD 51 goes far beyond a plan of succession for merely the Executive Branch. It goes far beyond the local and temporary implementation of Martial Law. It allows for one man, the President, to lead the entire federal government. It subjects the Constitution to his sole interpretation. In effect, it is a recipe for perpetual Martial Law for the nation as a whole, and the precipitating event can be whatever the President decides it to be. Just or unjust, it matters not. After all is said and done, who will dare question Caesar?
Like distant red-shifted galaxies dimly receding from our sight at ever accelerating velocities, I am beginning to believe that we may never see the 2008 election.
Comments:
|
May. 30, 2007 at 06:33:43 AM
|
||
| Thanks Doc Moron, I'd heard Thom Hartman going on about this, couldn't find it any "news" sources though. So Nov 2008, what're the odds of us having an election? Or will we have an event? |
||
|
May. 30, 2007 at 07:31:01 AM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Here is another article on Bush's Enabling Act: [link:www.smirkingchimp.com] |
||
|
|
May. 30, 2007 at 09:45:39 AM
|
|
| And gun control is good because...... Almost a year ago MIC, you and I made a bet that, as I recall you're loosing to this point. Care to make it double-or-nothing that we even have a 2008 election? There's two words in the trigger of this Directive that SHOULD strike fear in everyones heart, they are "disruption" and "economy" Natural disasters and terrorists attacks are not easily controled by government, but a "disruption" to the "economy" can be accomplished by the president with a simple phone call to the Fed Bank Chairman. "Bank Holidays" and confiscation of our money is nothing new, besides we've already had terrorist attacks and natural disasters. Think I'm nuts? In 29 the Fed raised interest rates 3 times and contracted the money supply and we know what happened in Oct of that year. We've had 17 interest rate hikes to date to defend the value of the dollar and the Fed is contracting TFC by about 5 billion a week. I've been doing battle with this "Directive" on some of the firearms type forums and have come to the conclusion that this country is freeking doomed!!! Those that are paying attention, and can see the problems coming, need to arm up, stockpile ammunition, food, water and fuel. If for no other reason than you'll have to fight off the vast majority that care more about American Idol than what their government is doing when the bread lines start forming Dave |
||
|
May. 30, 2007 at 06:11:09 PM
|
||
| Good article! Good comments! will be stocking up! Just hope they don't hit the nuclear plant . . .
|
||
|
May. 30, 2007 at 11:10:58 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| MIC, I wil not say that your paranoia is unwarranted as it does strike one as all emcompassing. However, after reading both it and PDD 67 issued by Clinton in 1998 it appears to me to be more motivated by the Katrina disaster and the inequities proven out by that disaster than to prepare for a planned coming attack and or catastrophe. I could be wrong here, but I believe that this is an attempt, and I say attempt because with yet another layer of governmental interference I doubt it will work any better than most of what government trys to do, at being able to better mobilize during and emergency while not having to wait for the state to make such a request for assistance. This gives the Federal Government predetermined authority to react to a problem prior to the states recognition that it indeed needs the assistance. Not sure I like it either way. |
||
|
May. 30, 2007 at 11:15:27 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Hunter, when Martial Law is enforced, I'll let you shoot it out with whatever National Guard we still have in this country -- I will be illegally immigrating to Mexico. As for our bet, I still would love to see the original terms but cannot find them. I am not so sure I am "losing so far." After four months, the Democrats have achieved modest legislative successes: 1) The House restored the requirement the US Attorney General have Senate approval for all US Attorney interim appointments 2) The House passed pay-as-you-go budgets regulations 3) The House passed anti-earmark legislation requiring full disclosure of earmarks and restricting the trading of earmarks for votes 4) The Senate ncreased combat pay for National Guard and Reserves 5) The Senate extended a moratorium on oil well drilling in ANWR And this awful Iraq Spending Bill will at least raise minimum wages, increase VA funding, increase Katrina rebuilding funds, increase funding for Port Security, and revisit in three months (a short leash) any further Iraq appropriations. Remember that in the bill that Bush vetoed with timetables, the funding would have been through the end of the year. Now in terms of what the Democrats have done for us by not doing what the 109th Congress would have done as a rubber stamp for Bush, who knows? And what would we know about the multitude of scandals that Congressional investigations have uncovered since the Democrats took power? Could we even breath the word impeachment, rather than have serious discussions about it in the MSM? Don't write off impeachment yet. Oh, and we would almost certainly be at war with Iran right now if it weren't for those woosies. (We might still go to war with Iran before Spring has ended, so I won't call this a Democratic achievement just yet.) I will go double or nothing with you Hunter. It's a no-brainer for me. If you are right and we do not have an election in 2008, owing you two fine-dining meals will be the least of my problems. On the other hand, if we have an election I wouldn't mind celebrating a Democratic victory with two separate elk dinners. If the neocons try to suspend the election, but we respond by putting their heads on pikes and the elections proceed as planned, I still win. If the election are delayed until 2009 to give time for the heads to decompose, we'll call it a draw. If the elections proceed in November 2008, but a Republican wins (by virtue of stealing the election), I will still take you out for one dinner, because I'm a bleeding heart liberal. |
||
|
May. 30, 2007 at 11:38:34 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| If Bush intended on staying in office for ever wouldnt he try to make life easier on the peasants. If you want to be KING you MUST give your followers some kind of hope and you must be a leader. You all give him to much credit, he is a Pond and after the 2008 election you will be aqainted with another Pond. The object of the game is to make sure the Pond will have the power it needs to survive. He is just following the golden plan and that plan is to keep us all broke and scared s***less. The magic of it all is they want you to stock pile food, guns and fuel.
|
||
|
|
May. 31, 2007 at 01:51:05 PM
|
|
| MIC Our bet was on page 3 of "2 Party Pretense", published on 8/19/06, and was as follows.... ""As I recall we had Impeachment, just debating an article on the floor by Nov 08 wins Ending or trying to end the war in Iraq no matter how. (resolutions and budgets need to get out of committee and actually be voted on, up or down doesn't matter) Repeal the Patriot Act, again, full floor votes End domestic spying, through law or sanctions Real 9-11 investagations, reopen the case and ask the hard questions in open hearings OK 5, 2 out of 5, sound good?"" The Demohacks had to accomplish 2 out of 5 of these outrages. Since that day we've learned a lot more about spying and the dem's have conducted some good investigations, but none about 9-11. And the investigations into spying have not lead to any changes other that the one you pointed out about congressional approval for U.S. Attorney's, which we didn't even know about when the bet was made. We also got the "Military Commisions Act" since then, which the Dem's have done nothing to repeal. The Iraq War budget congress passed and the Fuhrer vetoed did not contain binding troop pullout dates, and therefor did nothing to end the war. In fact it also funded the "surge" of 21,000 additional troops. Some resolutions that will end the war have been submited, but as far as I know they have not made it out of committee and to the full floor. Impeachment is off the table according to Speaker Nancy. And the Patriot Act and Military Commisions Act are things the Demorats have wanted since 1995, they'll never give them up. My only hope is Rush, Hanity and a whole bunch of other neo-con cheerleaders "disappear" under the unconstitutional laws they champion. |
||
|
May. 31, 2007 at 08:39:12 PM
|
||
| The Iraq War budget congress passed and the Fuhrer vetoed did not contain binding troop pullout dates, and therefor did nothing to end the war. In fact it also funded the "surge" of 21,000 additional troops. On this, the House and Senate did pass a bill that would have ended the Occupation in March of 2008. Chuckle Nuts vetoed it. As for Pelosi and impeachment, the definition of "off the table" in US law and the Consititution is what, exactly? At the time of the election,she made the statement, as to deflect the idea that the first order of business was commencing with a impeachment vote. If through the investigations into Chuckle Nuts' administration it is found that the Deciderer has committed high crimes and misdeamors, well then, impeachment will be "on" the table. |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


[link:www.whitehouse.gov]
Report Abuse