Bu$hCo Protects Osama AGAIN!

Zanubiyah wrote on 08 August 2007, in an article titled "Taking the Boogieman Off the Shelf" this...

"And...you gotta wonder the practical common sense, logical question here.  I am not making acusations here, just asking reasonable questions.   Why would Usama bin Laden "preview" a video on a terrorist Islamic site?  If this is a known terrorist webpage, why is it still accessable on the internet, and why isn't it's originators in jail?  How would the US intelligence Department get an "advanced copy" of it?  If they can "intercept" a video, why can't they find out where it is originating from?  Why, if Usama bin Laden's spin machine knew this video would be "intercepted" by the US intelligence, and if he had a message to the American people would he not just release it on the internet without warning?  Who transcribes these videos, and why has never, the whole tirade been released to the American people in full context? 

I watch the rollout of new products, specificlly movies.  Note that they have critics talking, they offer previews and lots of advertising before hand to make you "anticipate" the product.  Does anyone see the parallels here.  Doesn't this Usama bin Laden video seem more like a marketing campaign, rather than a spontanious release of a madman?"

Thank you "adam" for finding and posting this article.  It just goes to show me, and hopefully the others in here that we have no intention whatsoever to get Usama bin Laden as long as he and his minions can be used to put the fear in us enough to give our freedoms and privacies over to the Neocon "savior".  It means all along that Usama bin Laden's hiding place may have been known all this time, and that his value as "the boogieman" is more important than his justice to the Neocon.

Again, the questions should arise...What do you worship?  Who do you depend on to protect your family, cherished ones, friends and neigbours?  What does "the savior" require you to give in return (since freedom is not free), and when will that savior find you not worthy enough to be under his domain.  It seems to me that if one belives that God in omnipotant, there should not be a need to give over your rights to a man or his institutions.  If there were more real faith in the omnipotant being, then Usama bin Laden and his minions would be much less of a threat to those who claim to believe because we would not be so driven to make decisions against the very essence that God put in us to be free by fear.  And yet, I find that people who claim faith are the most afraid, and most willing to trust their freedoms and privacy to men

Using the boogieman to instill fear before a major debate about this war in this case was blatantly obvious to those not blinded by the light in this case.  Unfortunatly, there are very few who have not looked into the sun of evil dressed just like us.

Wake up before we are awakend by the lash of the master we now empower. 

Good show, Adam!

The Bush Administration is good at keeping secrets - except when it counts!

BTW, according to the Washington buzz, the leakers were White House counsel Fred F. Fielding and Michael Leiter, who holds the No. 2 job at the National Counterterrorism Center.

indie616 says:  It was complete incompetence for the Bushies to leak it early.  Their record of complete incompetence is long.  

Incompetence is NOT deliberate, EVIL is......

Zunybiyah,

Like the followes of Jim Jones, Bu$hites will follow him to the death of "Armaggedon".
I am sure you understand these 'End Timers' there is eschatology in Islam as well.
These people celebrate the rise of evil, for it is the forebearer of 'heaven'.
http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2004/10/27/scherer-christian/

You've got the NeoCONs who wholly support the deification of Bu$h, as they are the business managers of his wars prophetting very well in mediocre times, wars supported by fundie 'christians', and people like Bu$h's friend Hagee who wants to drop nukes across Iran in the name of Jesus.....

The most important thing to consider is that the biggest justification they percieve is the fact that some persecute Bu$h and meaning he really is doing God's work.....never mind some persecuted Hitler....although Eschatologists celebrated the rise of Hitler as foretelling the return of Jesus as well.....

Update on the leakers, for those who are following that mundane topic - now we know who it wasn't:

Joby Warrick, in The Washington Post: "U.S. intelligence officials will investigate allegations that the government improperly leaked a secretly obtained Osama bin Laden video, alerting al-Qaeda to a security gap in the terrorist group's internal communications network that it was able to shut, an intelligence spokesman said yesterday."

Yesterday, Warrick wrote, "just five hours after a private intelligence company sent confidential links to the video to White House Counsel Fred F. Fielding and the No. 2 official at the National Counterterrorism Center, Michael Leiter, the video showed up on the Fox News Web site."

Now both the White House and the National Counterterrorism Center are denying responsibility.

Ah, and Dana Perino chimed in yesterday saying Fielding was not the leaker. At the same time, Ross Feinstein, a spokesman for the director of national intelligence, told Warrick: "At this point, we don't think there was a leak from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence or the National Counterterrorism Center."

WHEW!  It's NOT one of US! Feel relieved?  I do!

Motivation?  When we catch that commie-pinko-fag-terrorist, we'll un-habeas corpus him and rough him up - toughly, safely, lawfully and necessarily - until he tells us what we already know he knows - it was a combination of malice aforethought to jeopardize innocent lives, Divine Islamic Intervention and the Spirit of Scooter Libby that made him do it!

When this's over, we'll all be thankful there's an on-going warrantless federal eavesdropping program!

Pass the Kool Aid!

White House denials?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/10/20031007-4.html
Q Scott, you have said that you, personally, went to Scooter Libby, Karl Rove and Elliot Abrams to ask them if they were the leakers. Is that what happened? Why did you do that, and can you describe the conversations you had with them? What was the question you asked?

MR. McCLELLAN: Unfortunately, in Washington, D.C., at a time like this, there are a lot of rumors and innuendo. There are unsubstantiated accusations that are made. And that's exactly what happened in the case of these three individuals. They're good individuals, they're important members of our White House team, and that's why I spoke with them, so that I could come back to you and say that they were not involved. I had no doubt of that in the beginning, but I like to check my information to make sure it's accurate before I report back to you, and that's exactly what I did.

Q So you're saying -- you're say

White House denials?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/10/20031007-4.html
Q Scott, you have said that you, personally, went to Scooter Libby, Karl Rove and Elliot Abrams to ask them if they were the leakers. Is that what happened? Why did you do that, and can you describe the conversations you had with them? What was the question you asked?

MR. McCLELLAN: Unfortunately, in Washington, D.C., at a time like this, there are a lot of rumors and innuendo. There are unsubstantiated accusations that are made. And that's exactly what happened in the case of these three individuals. They're good individuals, they're important members of our White House team, and that's why I spoke with them, so that I could come back to you and say that they were not involved. I had no doubt of that in the beginning, but I like to check my information to make sure it's accurate before I report back to you, and that's exactly what I did.

Q So you're saying -- you're saying categorically those three individuals were not the leakers or did not authorize the leaks; is that what you're saying?

MR. McCLELLAN: That's correct. I've spoken with them.

What's more, he labeled any suggestion to the contrary “ridiculous.”

indie

Please understand that this was actually an itelligence blunder, and maybe bigtime too.  Please understand that it takes a long time and alot of effort to get the evil ones at al Quid'a to trust a web domain enough to post this stuff on it.  First off, the guy whow gave it to "senior intelligence officers" should be sent to jail for being a traitor.  He should have known, given the past record of Neocon staff that this would not be a good idea.  It is amazing that Fox News was given this tape first, and that even the FBI did not know of this tape until it was in the media.

It is now noted that the "preview" of the bin Laden tape came on 07 Sept. (I made a mistake in dating my quote from a previous article), and by the next day, all of the hard work and long hours of culturing the intellignece was gone.  Why indie.  Remember that General Petraus was to give his "assessment" of the escalation (surge) on the Monday next.   Don't you think that keeping the cultured intelligence would have been much more important that releasing a bin Laden tape.  He (bin Laden) made no threats, and really said nothing important, or nothing he hasn't already said.  In other words, there must have been another motive, other than news to do so.  And, one has to assume that the Neocons think it is more important to instill fear in Americans then it is to catch and bring bin Laden to his justice.  Again, the boogieman is more important to the REAL motive of the Neocon than his justice.  He is like the "Goldstien"charater in 1984...the face of the perpetual enemy of a perpetual war.  If you can dispute me, do so.  Attack what I post indie, not me.  These are my opinions, based on my interpretation of the news.  Nothing more, nothing less.

Again, please note that in my post about this, in my article I stated clearly "I am not making any accusations".  I was only questioning the "preview" and relating it to a "product roll out".  I did make rational assessments based on my "questioning" on why Usama bin Laden was still out there, and when a national debate comes along on the occupation of Iraq, this fear card is always played.  It is just an observation...but this time, since I was not privy to secret intellignece (unfortunatly I am now because of the "sheer stupidity" of senior government officials, and the mentality of the American people to be driven by fear) turned out to be right.  It was a "product roll out"