So I ran across this scheme and instantly became suspicious. Anytime someone devlops a "new" tax plan, that involves one rate it generally means raising the amount the middle class pays so rich guys can pay less. But here is one that I think passes the American sense of fairness, and will be impossible for lobbyists to put in loopholes.
It is the Automated Payment Transaction tax at apttax.com.
Here's how it works-
1. Every financial transaction is taxed at 1 rate.
2. eliminate all other taxes; payroll, income, inheritance, excise taxes etc
They eggheads who came up with this peg the rate at 0.3%. So every transaction of $100 would carry a tax of 30 cents! And it would be revenue neutral. In their study a family earning $60,000 today owes about 20,000 in tax, under the APT it would drop to 720. Where does the differnece come from?
Every financial tansaction, including money moved on the staock exchanges, and the bond traders would pay. Speculators on the Forex or the commodities markets would pay too. And all those millions, or billions of dollars of trading would pay this low tax. No exceptions. Then Republicans could be happy with the fair flat rate. And it would eliminate auditing income returns.
Of course, thats not what Republicans want. They want to lower taxes on Rich folks, and raise them on the middle class. That is their idea of fair.
A new on taxes from Democrats
|
Posted By: Phaedrus Posted on: May. 5, 2006 at 1:20 PM |
3.8 / 5
Based on 4 ratings.
|
Comments:
|
May. 5, 2006 at 05:42:24 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Actually Phae, this is a great idea. Here's why... It's actually fair. Those who have little money uise the services of financial institutions very little. Those that have money will use it more, but they don't have too. They can learn to manage this as they do other things, picking the moment of greatest rerurn to offset the price of the transaction tax itself. The middle class who do a few transactions per month will pay a fair sahe of the cost while the rich will pay the same fair share as they deem it necessary to use the features you mentioned. As Az mod asked, this only applies (fairness) if it is in the realm of money movement and not purchasing of daily needs. As a Republican it is important that personal responsibility be incorporated into the system. I can see no better way than this. You don't want to pay the tax, don't move the money. |
||
|
May. 6, 2006 at 01:29:36 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| LIES!! Typical Republican!
|
||
|
May. 6, 2006 at 02:20:20 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| ALOT OF THE DEMOCRATS ARE REALLY JUST MILDLY DISQUISED REPUBLICANS (Who need to be sent packing, too). Like when fox has a couple republicans and supposed democrats on to discusse some idoitic issue. and the palooka democrat looks like a retard! We got retard democrats(republicans) in our midst!!
|
||
|
May. 6, 2006 at 09:49:05 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| First, this apllies to every purchase, payment, everything that happens in the USA involving payments for godds and/or services. Second Prometheus- I am not a rightie troll hiding behind a Democrat veneer. I'm the guy at the bookstore who notices the new Ted Kennedy books turned back cover out and says things like "Jesus, it must be sad to be a conservative and be so petty, and hateful that you'd try to hide books in bookstores. Usually I thought Republicans just grabbed them and burned books they didn't like" - So try first reading about the proposal at apttax.com, and understand that for the median income americans $60,000/ year in income they're paying $20,000 a year in taxes now- this proposal would lower their tax burden to $720 a year. Now Prometheus, regrow your liver and tell me, would you rather pay $700 or $20,000? And would you rather see Paris Hilton, Dick Cheney, and Micheal Eisner pay 0.3% of every transaction they conduct? Sell $10mil of Haliburton, pay $30k. Whats he pay now? As little as his greasy accountant can swing. Paris gets a stock option for Hilton shares, pay 0.3%. It'll bring equity to taxation, and remove lobbyists' biggest motivation "Senator Frist, the poor ol' oil industry needs another billion in tax breaks..." - with the APT there ARE NO TAX BREAKS! Death to the Industry Lobbyist Scum! It'll take the corporate money out of Washington, and give more power to citizens. How? Because if the industry can't bribe/donate to get a tax break, then they'llneed to ask for straight up corporate welfare/subsidy, which is much harder to pass. |
||








del.icio.us
Digg It!


Report Abuse