I am going to make an uncharacteristically bold move. I am using this platform to announce, definitively, once and for all; that I am firmly against assassinating President Bush, Tony Blair, or any other head of state. I know that I am taking a risk here, removing options from the table, and I may regret this decision in the future, but that’s just the way I feel. Don’t try to change my mind. As things stand today, I’m simply not for killing them - end of story.
What motivated me to take a stance on this issue? Well, it seems like assassination is quickly becoming the talk of the town. George Galloway, outspoken British MP and critic of the so called “Coalition of the Willing,” recently stated his view that the assassination of Prime Minister Tony Blair would be “morally justified” as a response to Britain’s support for the 2003 U.S. led invasion of Iraq. Now his is not advocating that anybody go out right away and attempt to murder Blair, per se. He’s just saying that if you did, for instance, shoot Tony Blair in the head, you might be able to make a good case for yourself in court. Galloway also said that if he did have knowledge of a plot to kill Mr. Blair, he would inform the police – of course. So, for anybody that still thinks assassinating Tony Blair is a good idea, don’t tell George Galloway about it. Enough said.
Now I like George Galloway. I like his spunky attitude and the way he boldly speaks truth to power. I’m as incensed as he is with Bush and Blair for their part in instigating the war in Iraq. I think it’s refreshing that a Member of Parliament is just itching for a fistfight with both of them at the same time. But let’s face it – he is no trailblazer when it comes to publicly pushing for assassination.
Last August Christian televangelist Pat Robertson beat him to the punch by suggesting that the United States should assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez tout suit. "If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think we really ought to go ahead and do it,” Robertson told his peace-loving flock during a live broadcast of The 700 Club. Robertson subsequently tried to distance himself from his remarks, explaining: "I didn't say 'assassination.' I said our special forces should 'take him out.' And 'take him out' can be a number of things, including kidnapping; there are a number of ways to take out a dictator from power besides killing him.” Now maybe it’s me, but I think that when you tell faithful members of the Christian Broadcasting Network "we have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability,” I don’t think you’re talking about a first date.
My hat’s off to these gentlemen. I wish I had the same strength of conviction to stick to my guns, so to speak, on this issue. I know, I know . . . even President Bush told the world that we will get Osama bin Laden, “dead or alive.” But like me, I think he may have backed down from this stance, since we haven’t killed him yet. So for the record, please understand that I want to impeach the President, not impale him. If we end up hanging our leaders, it better be after – and not a minute before - a fair trial.
A Bold Stance on Assassination
|
Posted By: www.MoronInCharge.com Posted on: May. 26, 2006 at 8:01 PM |
3.7 / 5
Based on 9 ratings.
|
Anonymous commenting has been disabled, you must login to comment on articles.
Signup for an accountComments:
|
May. 26, 2006 at 10:23:38 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| There are dozens of Terrorists out there with bullseyes on their foreheads!!! And not a one of them has done more damage to our world then this bonehead president and his gay english buddy over there! My god I thought they would hold hands and kiss as they walked out to the press conference together! Not that there is anything wrong with that (unless you publically advocate persecuting Gays, and then act like them). In time, all there bombs, armies and S.S. police may not be able to stop the bad karma they,ve created for themselves from kickin them in their stupid queer heads!
|
||
|
May. 26, 2006 at 11:27:50 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| How in the world do some of you have time to respond to as many articles as you do? That must be a real treat to have that much time on your hands. Not jealous. Just curious. Must be nice. I gotta get away quite often. Many other things to do that multi tasking with computers can't do. Physical stuff. |
||
|
May. 26, 2006 at 11:46:48 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| It’s the damnedest thing, www.MoronInCharge.com. I spend time and pass-after-pass through the Update and Preview process, and still once I publish I find typos and misprints! I feel your pain. Oh yeah. On the subject of assassination – the attempts on Hitler were justified. There are perhaps a few leaders in the north of Korea and in parts of Africa that could use a little assassination, but generally it is not a good practice to support. Why, you ask? Well, as much damage as Bush has done to our Constitution and Bill-of-Rights, our moral standing in the world, our economy, our Sovereignty, our … Hmmm! Well anyway, it is wrong because, as in the case of JFK for example, it subrogates the will of the many to that of one or a few. That is outrageous and bad for representative democracy. But, as with the Atomic option for Iran that Mr. Bush refuses to disavow, I can understand how hard it is to take any option off the table in extreme circumstances. Now assassination of the NeocNazi Corporatist agenda that Mr. Bush acts as the hood ornament for is greatly to be desired. Let’s target that at the polls in November of 2006. |
||
|
May. 27, 2006 at 03:11:27 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Does this mean that you want to assinate me because this is the impression I get? Why am I writing so much gibberish? Because I can and like to get people involved, good or bad. You like many other sit on the sideline while other attempt to get over on us(the politicians) and all you can do is b*tch. I am involved because I can no longer stand this politic as usual. The politicians that are in there now don't care about you or any others on this website. Be heard, be seen, or shut and sit down along with don't write. I am on the westside and it is easy to see my subburban with my signs, come and get me. PS - Just me not the eleven grandchildren that I am taking care of right now. Walk in my shoes if you dare....... |
||
|
May. 27, 2006 at 03:58:04 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| William, thanks for resurrecting so many of my articles at one time. And thanks for the positive feedback on last week's show. Now allow me to be blunt once again. No one wants to assassinate you. But lest you get too big a head on your shoulders because you are running for office, let me remind you that there are many ways to contribute. Some of us write, some of us put a bumper sticker on our car, and some of us learn the issues to the best of our abilites and vote. Don't get so high and mighty because we haven't walked in your shoes - last I checked I had my own pair (of shoes). As for your contribution, more power to you, and keep trying. It's a noble effort of yours to run for office. But I will repeat my reality-grounded prediction that you will fail miserably if all you have to offer are half-baked stances, platitudes, vague promises, a self-proclaimed good heart, and an inability to communicate effectively. I believe that when you are not shoveling the above, you are working us over for our sympathy vote. That too will not work out so well, when you seem to be either licking or pissing on the hand that's feeding you. |
||
|
May. 27, 2006 at 04:05:26 PM
|
||
| In Williams defense he wrote this line, one of the funniest I have seen on V of A: "I did accomplish one thing if nothing else, I shook the tree and look what fell out: a herd of discontents." |
||
|
May. 27, 2006 at 04:40:01 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| A very tasty fruit indeed. I enjoy a herd of discontents after a savory peck of pickled peppers. |
||
|
May. 27, 2006 at 08:58:03 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Well Moron, I heartily agree with your anti assassination stance, but I will go you one further; I oppose and renounce anyone who advocates torturing George Dubya on or any member of his Can't Shoot Straight Gang to further any criminal investigations of Bush's administration. There are those who say, "Torture works. And we know they're Guilty! So let's be quick about it, put Scooter and Rove on the rack and let's get the truth!" But I say Nay, verily, the foundation of our Republic is based upon man's inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness! Though I may be wrong. If torturing Rove could save millions of lives, end the Neocon's crusade against Islam and on oil fields... Wait, those millions who are dying in this war all have brown skin, so Republicans tell me their lives are worth less than white lives. |
||
|
May. 29, 2006 at 12:43:18 AM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| I do not advocate torture as a method for extracting information. It does not work. The victim will tell you anything in order to get the torture to stop, even if temporarilly. Anything learned from torture is suspect intelligence, and by our own laws, such evidence is not admissible in a court of law. On the other hand, if torture is not intended to extract information, but merely employed as a form of retribution, then I will have to rethink the whole premise for my opposition. I'm still against killing them though . . . unless it was accidental as a result of too much torture. |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


also
"Now his is not advocating" should read
"Now he is not advocating."
Report Abuse